http://photojojouncut.disqus.com/enWed, 02 Dec 2009 14:05:39 -0000http://photojojo.com/uncut/2008/07/08/getty-and-flickr/#comment-24620904<p>nice <br><a href="http://www.staffingpower.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.staffingpower.com">www.staffingpower.com</a><br></p>itjobs1Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:05:39 -0000http://photojojo.com/uncut/2008/07/08/getty-and-flickr/#comment-16956837<p>I have quoted you and commented on this business deal on my blog:</p><p><a href="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/scottschram/archive/2008/07/why_are_getty_i.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://weblogs.java.net/blog/scottschram/archive/2008/07/why_are_getty_i.html">http://weblogs.java.net/blo...</a></p><p>(I tried to use trackback, and it got an error.)</p><p>Thanks!</p><p>Scott</p>Scott SchramSat, 19 Jul 2008 12:28:01 -0000http://photojojo.com/uncut/2008/07/08/getty-and-flickr/#comment-16956836<p>Getty will take over Flickr soon enough. <br>They're legal actions against those who use images by accident on websites not watermarked as Getty images is far too stronghanded in recent years - including using debt collection agencies and huge legal fees etc., You'd want to read any contract with them very carefully!</p>daveWed, 09 Jul 2008 05:57:48 -0000